Friday, March 28, 2014

Publications challenging claims of cancers from diagnostic imaging

Publications challenging claims of cancers from diagnostic imaging


  1. No Increased Risk of Cancer from CT Scans, M. Doss, American Journal of Roentgenology, 2014;202:W410. Available at:  http://www.ajronline.org/doi/full/10.2214/AJR.13.11525
  1. Linear No-Threshold Model May Not Be Appropriate for Estimating Cancer Risk from CT, M. Doss, Radiology 2014, 270, :307–308.  http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.13131661
  1. Conclusion of Increased Risk of Cataracts Associated with CT Scans of the Head May Not be Justified, M. Doss, American Journal of Roentgenology, 2014;202:W413-W.   Available at:        http://www.ajronline.org/doi/full/10.2214/AJR.13.11867
  1. Addition of diagnostic CT scan does not increase the cancer risk in patients undergoing SPECT studies, Mohan Doss, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014. Available at: http://nuclearmedicineandmolecularimaginggateway.net/ArticlePage.aspx?DOI=10.1007/s00259-014-2711-0
  1. Radiation doses from radiological imaging do not increase the risk of cancer.  Letter to the editor regarding the article by Brenner: “What we know and what we don't know about cancer risks associated with radiation doses from radiological imaging", Mohan Doss, British Journal of Radiology, 2014;87:20140085. Available at: http://www.birpublications.org/doi/full/10.1259/bjr.20140085          
  2. Radiation Dose Justification and Optimization Should Not be Applied to Medical Imaging in Emergency Medicine -  (Letter to the Editor regarding "Sierzenski, et al. Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. Jan 2014;63(1):25-32.), Mohan Doss, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Accepted for Publication, Mar 13, 2014.                                                                             
  3. CT Radiation Dose Optimization is Not Advisable in View of Current Knowledge (Letter to the Editor regarding “R. Smith-Bindman and J.M. Boone. Introduction to the Special Issue: Radiation Dose Optimization-Improving the Safety of CT. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):229-30.”, Mohan Doss, Journal of American College of Radiology, 2014 Jul;11(7):745-746.   Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144014001550
  4. Point/Counterpoint: Low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful, Mohan Doss, Mark P. Little, Colin G. Orton, Medical Physics, 41, 070601 (2014). Available at: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/41/7/10.1118/1.4881095

Online Comments in response to journal articles:
    1. Carcinogenic Concerns Regarding CT Scans are Unwarranted, M Doss, Online Comment regarding "Questioning protocol., Randi Redmond Oster, JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May 1;174(5):667."  http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1835362

    2. 
CT Scans Are Not Dangerous, M Doss., Online Comment regarding "Coping with headaches., Katz MH., JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May 1;174(5):821-2.".  Available at: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1835343